Simulating a Cyber-Attack on the Mass Thruster Controllers at Low-Speed Motion

Authors

  • Igor ASTROV Tallinn University of Technology, Department of Software Science
  • Sanja BAUK Tallinn University of Technology, Estonian Maritime Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v36i6.797

Keywords:

MASS, cyber-attack, thruster, PID controller, Kalman filter, state-space method

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to highlight the vulnerability of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) to cyber-attack and to illustrate, through a simulation experiment on a testbed, how to mitigate a cyber-attack on the MASS thruster controllers during low-speed motion. The first part of the paper is based on a scoping review of relevant articles in the field, including some MASS projects, related cyber threats and modelling techniques to improve cyber resilience. In the second part of the paper, a cyber-attack on the MASS thruster controllers at low speed motion is illustrated along with the impact of the attack on the trajectory motion. The Kalman filter, as an additional device to the thruster controllers, is used as a cyber-attack mitigation aid. Under the conditions of a simulated intrusion on the input and output signals of the thruster, the experiments conducted in the MATLAB Simulink environment provide an insight into the behaviour of the MASS propulsion subsystem from the perspective of the low-speed trajectory, with and without the Kalman filter.

References

James FA, Ioannis C. Ships without crews: IMO and UK responses to cybersecurity, technology, law and regulation of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS). Frontiers in Computer Science. 2023;5. DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1151188.

Bauk S, et al. Autonomous marine vehicles in sea surveillance as one of the COMPASS2020 project concerns. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1357. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1357/1/012045.

Astrov I, et al. Simulink/MATLAB based comparison of neural and basic tracking control for an autonomous surface vessel for situation awareness applications. Proceedings of the IEEE Joint 19th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics and 7th IEEE International Conference on Recent Achievements in Mechatronics, Automation, Computer Sciences and Robotics 2019, 14-16 Nov. 2019, Szeged, Hungary. 2019;105–110. DOI: 10.1109/CINTI-MACRo49179.2019.9105230.

Astrov I, et al. Target tracking by neural predictive control of the autonomous surface vessel for environment monitoring and cargo transportation applications. Proceedings of the 17th Biennial Baltic Electronics Conference 2020, 6-8 Oct. 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. 2020;1-4. DOI: 10.1109/BEC49624.2020.9277115.

Chang CH, et al. Risk assessment of the operations of maritime autonomous surface ships. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2021;207:107324. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107324.

Dupont B, et al. The tensions of cyber-resilience: From sensemaking to practice. Computers & Security. 2023;132:103372. DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2023.103372.

Udal A, et al. Modeling the trajectory tracking accuracy of an autonomous catamaran patrol vessel under different positional data disturbance conditions. Proceedings of the 10th Maritime Transport Conference 2024, 5-7 June 2024, Barcelona, Spain. 2024;1-15. DOI: 10.5821/mt.13165.

Astrov I, Bauk S. Simulating a cyber-attack on an autonomous sea surface vessel’s rudder controller. Proceedings of the 13th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing 2024, 11-14 June 2024, Budva, Montenegro. 2024;558-564.

Pietrzykowski Z, Hajduk J. Operations of maritime surface ships. TransNav – The International Journal on Maritime Navigation and Sea Transportation. 2019;13(4):725-733. DOI: 10.12716/1001.13.04.04.

Sahoo A, Dwivedy SK, Robi PS. Advancement in the field of autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Engineering. 2019;181:145-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.011.

Bauk S, Kapidani N, Boisgard JP, Lukšić Ž. (2021). Key features of the autonomous underwater vehicles for marine surveillance missions. In: Bauk S, Ilčev SD (eds) The 1st International Conference on Maritime Education and Development. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64088-0_7.

Van Brummelen J, et al. Autonomous vehicle perception: The technology of today and tomorrow. Transport Research Part C. 2018;89(2018):384-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.012.

Wingrove M (June 4, 2024). One year to go for IMO non-mandatory MASS Code. https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/one-year-to-go-for-imo-non-mandatory-mass-code-81022#:~:text=IMO%20is%20writing%20a%20legislative,on%20the%20progress%20to%20date [Accessed on 6th September 2024].

Meadow G, et al. Autonomous shipping – Putting the human back in the headline. IMarEST. Report number: 2018:1, 2018. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18628.37768.

Lloyd’s Register. ShipRight design and construction. Additional Design Procedures. LR Code for Unmanned Marine Systems. 2017.

Yara (n.d.). MV Yara Birkeland. https://www.yara.com/news-and-media/media-library/press-kits/yara-birkeland-press-kit/ [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Skopljak N (September 19, 2023). SEA-KIT one step closer to developing first type-approved USV control system. https://www.offshore-energy.biz/sea-kit-one-step-closer-to-developing-first-type-approved-usv-control-system/ [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Congressional Research Service (December 30, 2023). Navy large unmanned surface and undersea vehicles: Background and issues for congress. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/R45757.pdf [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Baird Maritime (March 31, 2023). Vessel Review: Zhu Hai Yun – Chinese-built drone mothership boasts autonomous sailing systems. https://www.bairdmaritime.com/work-boat-world/specialised-fields/marine-research-and-training/vessel-review-zhu-hai-yun-chinese-built-drone-mothership-boasts-autonomous-sailing-systems/ [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Yellig J (June 14, 2023). Myflower autonomous ship makes unmanned Atlantic crossing. https://www.iotworldtoday.com/transportation-logistics/mayflower-autonomous-ship-makes-unmanned-atlantic-crossing#close-modal [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Korean Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (n.d.). Korea autonomous surface ship project detail. https://kassproject.org/en/info/projectdetail.php [Accessed on 27th June 2024].

Rolls-Royce. Autonomous ships – The next step. 2016. https://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/%20customers/marine/ship-intel/rr-ship-intel-aawa-8pg.pdf [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Ship Technology (April 13, 2016). Rolls-Royce reveals vision of remote and autonomous shipping through AAWA project latest findings. https://www.ship-technology.com/news/newsrolls-royce-reveals-vision-of-remote-and-autonomous-shipping-through-aawa-project-latest-findings-4863708/?cf-view [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

Homepage of MindChip OÜ, a spin-off company of Tallinn University of Technology. https://mindchip.ee [Accessed on 27th June 2024].

Kessler GC, Shepard SD. Maritime Cybersecurity – A guide for leaders and managers. Printed in Great Britain by Amazon, 2022 (ISBN: 9798412526034).

GPS World (Tracy Cozzens, 12 February 2020), ADVA tackles GNSS jamming and spoofing with AI solutions. https://www.gpsworld.com/adva-tackles-gnss-jamming-and-spoofing-with-ai-solution [Accessed on 27th June 2024].

Kjerstad N. Electronic and acoustic navigation systems. NTNU, Ålesund, Norway, 2016 (ISBN: 9788292186572).

EUSPA (n.d.). About EGNOS. https://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/egnos-system/about-egnos [Accessed on 25th June 2024].

Bauk S, et al. Satellite navigation systems’ vulnerabilities and alternative solutions. Esti Laevanduse Aastaraamat 2024, p. 85-88. https://www.apollo.ee/eesti-laevanduse-aastaraamat-2024 [Accessed on 27th June 2024].

Wired (Matt Burgess, 21 September 2017). When a tanker vanishes, all the evidence points to Russia. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/black-sea-ship-hacking-russia [Accessed on 26th June 2024].

EUSPA (29 September, 2023). ASGARD: The ultimate response to maritime spoofing attack. https://www.euspa.europa.eu/newsroom/news/asgard-ultimate-response-maritime-spoofing-attacks [Accessed on 27th June 2024].

Björck F, et al. Cyber resilience - Fundamentals for a definition. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2015;353:311–316. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_31.

Roland TL. A warranty of cyberworthiness. IEEE Security and Privacy. 2004;2:73-76. DOI:10.1109/MSECP.2004.1281252.

Chaal M, et al. Research on risk, safety, and reliability of autonomous ships: A bibliometric review. Safety Science. 2023;167:106256. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106256.

Wróbel K, et al. System-theoretic approach to safety of remotely-controlled merchant vessel. Ocean Engineering. 2018;152:334-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.020.

Wróbel K, et al. Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2018;178:209-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.019.

Jones B, et al. The use of Bayesian network modelling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2010;95(3):267-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.10.007.

Ahn G, et al. Research on improving cyber resilience by integrating the zero trust security model with the MITRE ATT&CK matrix. IEEE Access. 2024;12:89291-89309. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3417182.

Kujo J. (2023). Implementing zero trust architecture for identities and endpoints with Microsoft tools. Master’s thesis. JAMK University of Applied Sciences.

Lim J, Yoo Y. Cyber threat and vulnerability analysis-based risk assessment for smart ship. Journal of Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety. 2024;30(2):263-274. DOI: 10.7837/kosomes.2024.30.3.263

Kavallieratos G, et al. Cyber-attacks against the autonomous ship. In: Katsikas S., et al. Computer Security. SECPRE CyberICPS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11387, Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12786-2.

Bolbot V, et al. Developments and research directions in maritime cybersecurity: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. 2022;39:100571. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100571.

Ding J, et al. CPS-based threat modeling for critical infrastructure protection. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 2017;45(2):129–132. DOI: 10.1145/3152042.3152080.

SI-SCADA International (2024). What does SCADA stand for? https://scada-international.com/what-is-scada/#:~:text=What%20does%20SCADA%20stand%20for,data%20from%20the%20industrial%20equipmen. [Accessed on 3rd September 2024].

CWE (March 22, 2024). Common weakness enumeration. https://cwe.mitre.org/about/index.html [Accessed on 3rd September 2024].

Astrov I, et al. An optimal control method for an autonomous surface vessel for environment monitoring and cargo transportation applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 25th International Conference ELECTRONICS 2021, 14-16 June 2021, Palanga, Lithuania. 2021;1–6. DOI: 10.1109/IEEECONF52705.2021.9467483.

Astrov I, et al. Wind force model and adaptive control of catamaran model sailboat. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications 2022, 18-20 Feb. 2022, Prague, Czech Republic. 2022;202–208. DOI: 10.1109/ICARA55094.2022.9738524.

Astrov I, et al. Experimentally adjusted modelling and simulation technique for a catamaran autonomous surface vessel. Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies 2022, 20-22 July 2022, Prague, Czech Republic. 2022;1-7. DOI: 10.1109/ICECET55527.2022.9873069.

Astrov I, Astrova I. A model-based adaptive control of turning maneuver for catamaran autonomous surface vessel. WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control. 2024;19:135-142. DOI: 10.37394/23203.2024.19.14.

Gierusz W, Rybczak M. Effectiveness of multidimensional controllers designated to steering of the motions of ship at low speed. Sensors. 2020. Vol. 20, June 2020, 3533. DOI: 10.3390/s20123533.

Lathi BP. Modern digital and analog communication systems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press, 1998 (ISBN: 9780195110098).

Downloads

Published

20-12-2024

How to Cite

ASTROV, I., & BAUK, S. (2024). Simulating a Cyber-Attack on the Mass Thruster Controllers at Low-Speed Motion. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 36(6), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v36i6.797