Evaluating the Efficiency of Urban Public Transport in Belgrade – A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach
Downloads
In an era marked by rapid urban development, the efficiency of public transport (PT) systems has taken on unprecedented significance. The main model for assessing the efficiency of PT systems is the data envelopment analysis (DEA). This study leverages DEA to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 12 PT lines in Belgrade, to optimise resource allocation. The first DEA model developed by Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR) under the assumption of a constant returns to scale production technology. By employing the input-oriented CCR DEA model, this research provides a comprehensive understanding of the efficiency landscape in Belgrade’s PT system. The primary hypothesis is that PT lines exhibiting characteristics such as reduced resource utilisation, a smaller fleet of engaged vehicles, lower vehicle frequency, decreased operating costs, and yet achieving a higher volume of transported passengers, are likely to be more efficient. The results of this analysis highlight three exceptional lines – Lines 23, 31 and 95 – all of which achieved an efficiency score of 1.000. Additionally, the study employs super-efficiency analysis, identifying Line 31 as the “most efficient”. These findings validate the initial hypothesis and have far-reaching implications for stakeholders, providing invaluable insights into potential strategies for fortifying Belgrade’s PT system.
Downloads
Hörcher D, Tirachini A. A review of public transport economics. Economics of Transportation. 2021;25(100196). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100196.
Georgiadis G, Politis I, Papaioannou P. Measuring and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of bus public transport systems. Research in Transportation Economics. 2014;48:84–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.035.
Novačko L, et al. Simulation-based public transport priority tailored to passenger conflict flows: A case study of the city of Zagreb. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021;11:4820. DOI: 10.3390/app11114820.
Hrelja R, Khan J, Pettersson F. How to create efficient public transport systems? A systematic review of critical problems and approaches for addressing the problems. Transport Policy. 2020;98:186–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.012.
Krasić D, Novačko L. The impact of public transport network accessibility on trip generation model. Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 2015;27(2):165–172. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v27i2.1591.
Bibri SE, Krogstie J, Kärrholm M. Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment. 2020;4(100021). DOI: 10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100021.
Barnum DT. Bibliography of Urban Transit DEA Publications. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2011. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1350583.
Farrell MJ. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1957;120(3):253-290.
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978;2(6):429-444. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 1984;30(9):1078-1092. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ. Introduction to operations research. 9th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2009.
Taha AH. Operations research: An introduction. 7th ed. Pearson Education; 2007.
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: With DEA-Solver software and references. Springer; 2006.
Chu X, Fielding GJ, Lamar BW. Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 1992;26(3):223-230. DOI: 10.1016/0965-8564(92)90033-4.
Obeng K. The economic cost of subsidy-induced technical inefficiency. International Journal of Transport Economics. 1994;21(1):3-20.
Nolan JF. Determinants of productive efficiency in urban transit. The Logistics and Transportation Review. 1996;32(3):319-342.
Viton PA. Technical efficiency in multi-mode bus transit: A production frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 1997;31(1):23-39. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00019-7.
Viton PA. Changes in multi-mode bus transit efficiency, 1988–1992. Transportation. 1998;25:1-21. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004906024774.
Boilé MP. Estimating technical and scale inefficiencies of public transit systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2001;127(3):187-194. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:3(187).
Karlaftis MG. A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004;152(2):354-364. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00029-8.
Boame AK. The technical efficiency of Canadian urban transit systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2004;40(5):401-416. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2003.09.002.
Tsamboulas DA. Assessing performance under regulatory evolution: A European transit system perspective. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2006;132(4):226-234. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:4(226).
Odeck J. Congestion, ownership, region of operation, and scale: Their impact on bus operator performance in Norway. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2006;40(1):52-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2004.05.001.
Margari BB, et al. Regulatory and environmental effects on public transit efficiency: A mixed DEA-SFA approach. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 2007;32(2):131–151. DOI: 10.1007/s11149-007-9025-0.
Borger B, Kerstens K, Staat M. Transit costs and cost efficiency: Bootstrapping non-parametric frontiers. Research in Transportation Economics. 2008;23(1):53–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2008.10.008.
Von Hirschhausen C, Cullmann A. A nonparametric efficiency analysis of German public transport companies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2010;46(3):436–445. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.11.005.
Hawas YE, Bayzid Khan M, Basu N. Evaluating and enhancing the operational performance of public bus systems using GIS-based data envelopment analysis. Journal of Public Transportation. 2012;15(2):19-44. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.15.2.2.
Hahn JS, et al. Efficiency analysis on bus companies in Seoul city using a network DEA model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2013;17(6):1480–1488. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-013-0467-x.
Vaidya OS. Evaluating the performance of public urban transportation systems in India. Journal of Public Transportation. 2014;17(4): 174-191. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.17.4.10.
Roháčová V. A DEA based approach for optimization of urban public transport system. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 2015;23(1):215-233. DOI: 10.1007/s10100-013-0314-7.
Carvalho M, Syguiy T, Silva DN. Efficiency and effectiveness analysis of public transport of Brazilian cities. Journal of Transport Literature. 2015;9(3):40-44. DOI: 10.1590/2238-1031.jtl.v9n3a8.
Venkatesh A, Kushwaha S. Short and long-run cost efficiency in Indian public bus companies using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2018;61:29-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2017.04.001.
Fitzová H, Matulová M. Comparison of urban public transport systems in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Factors underpinning efficiency. Research in Transportation Economics. 2020;81(100824). DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100824.
Sharma P, Jain JK, Kalla P. A study of efficiency measurement of Jaipur metro mass transit system using data envelopment analysis. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering. 2023;19(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1007/s11334-022-00511-0.
Liu M, et al. A dynamic network data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation on the benefits of bus transit services in 33 Chinese cities. Transportation Letters. 2023;16(4):392-404. DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2023.2198109.
Sheth C, Triantis K, Teodorović D. Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2007;43(4):453–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.010.
Barnum DT. Comparing the performance of bus routes after adjusting for the environment using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2009;134(2):77–85. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:2(77).
Lao Y, Liu L. Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2009;33(4):247–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.01.005.
Hahn JS, Kim HR, Kho SY. A DEA Approach for evaluating the efficiency of exclusive bus routes. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2010;8:1217-1229.
Zhu W, Yang X, Preston J. Efficiency measurement of bus routes and exogenous operating environment effects on efficiency. Transportation Planning and Technology. 2016;39(5):464–483. DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2016.1174364.
Güner S, Coşkun E. Estimating the operational and service efficiency of bus transit routes using a non-radial DEA approach. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics. 2018;8(3):249–268. DOI: 10.1007/s13676-018-0123-1.
Cazuza de Sousa Júnior JN, et al. Operational performance analysis of the public transport system over time. Infrastructures. 2023;8(5):82. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures8050082.
Karim Z, Fouad J. Measuring urban public transport performance on route level: A literature review. MATEC Web of Conferences: International Workshop on Transportation and Supply Chain Engineering (IWTSCE’18), 8-9 May 2018, Rabat, Morocco. 2018. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201820000021.
Copyright (c) 2026 Strahinja PANTELIĆ, Stanko BAJČETIĆ, Predrag ŽIVANOVIĆ, Branko MILOVANOVIĆ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













