Aerodynamics of Freight Trains – Addressing the Complexity of Train Geometry through an Open Database
Downloads
The study of the aerodynamics of freight trains is important for safety, efficiency and reducing damage during the operation of freight trains. It is also very important for the accurate estimation of drag resistance and, correspondingly, of the required traction effort. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is often used to investigate air flows around a freight train and their effects on vehicle dynamics, especially on drag, slipstream and pressure pulses in tunnels. Most of these studies, however, considered container wagons, while a much wider variety of wagon types are currently used. Therefore, there is a need for further research investigating the aerodynamics of more freight train geometries. This involves intensive work investigating realistic wagon geometries and generating representative generic versions. Subsequently, a complex freight train can be generated from these generic building blocks. To address the need for efficient production of these consists, a database of representative wagon and locomotive geometries was created. In this work, the geometry database is presented and is used to generate realistic freight train geometries suitable for CFD analyses. Then, selected results of CFD simulations performed using the geometries generated from the database are presented, demonstrating the use of the tool.
Downloads
White paper on transport – Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system [Internet]. 2011. http://europa.eu
Deutsche Bahn 2022 Integrated Report. 2022.
Geischberger J, Moensters M. Impact of faster freight trains on railway capacity and operational quality. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration. 2020;31;4(3):274–85. DOI: 10.2495/TDI-V4-N3-274-285
Quazi A, et al. A field study on the aerodynamics of freight trains with different stacking configurations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2023 Jan 1;232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105245
Alam F, Watkins S. Lateral stability of a double stacked container wagon under crosswind. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering 2007. 2007.
Li C, et al. Flow topology of a container train wagon subjected to varying local loading configurations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2017;1(169):12–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.011
Flynn D, Hemida H, Baker C. On the effect of crosswinds on the slipstream of a freight train and associated effects. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2016;1(156):14–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.07.001
Sterling M, Baker CJ, Jordan SC, Johnson T. A study of the slipstreams of high-speed passenger trains and freight trains. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2008;222(2):177–93. DOI: 10.1243/09544097JRRT133
Maleki S, Burton D, Thompson MC. Flow structure between freight train containers with implications for aerodynamic drag. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2019:1(188):194–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.02.007
Flynn D, Hemida H, Soper D, Baker C. Detached-eddy simulation of the slipstream of an operational freight train. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2014;132:1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.06.016
Bell J, et al. The effect of loading configuration on the slipstream of freight trains. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance. Civil-Comp Press; 2024. p. 1–14.
Alam F, Watkins S. Effects of crosswinds on double stacked container wagons. Gold Coast, Australia; 2007 Dec.
Buhr A, Siegel L, Bell J, Henning A. Energy savings for freight trains with aerodynamically optimized loading schemes. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp Press; 2024. DOI: 10.4203/ccc.7.3.2
Siegel L, Buhr A, Bell J, Henning A. Analysis of flow structures in different loading gaps of freight trains. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp Press; 2024. DOI: 10.4203/ccc.7.3.1
Giappino S, Rocchi D, Schito P, Tomasini G. Cross wind and rollover risk on lightweight railway vehicles. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2016;(1)153:106–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.03.013
Kocoń A, Flaga A. Critical velocity measurements of freight railway vehicles roll-over in wind tunnel tests as the method to assess their safety at strong cross winds. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104559
Soper D, Baker C, Sterling M. Experimental investigation of the slipstream development around a container freight train using a moving model facility. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2014;(1)135:105–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.001
Soper D, Baker C. A full-scale experimental investigation of passenger and freight train aerodynamics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2020;234(5):482–97. DOI: 10.1177/0954409719844431
Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - The finite volume method [Internet]. 2007. http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/versteeg
Wang S, et al. The performance of different turbulence models (URANS, SAS and DES) for predicting high-speed train slipstream. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2017;165:46–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.03.001
Maleki S, Burton D, Thompson MC. Assessment of various turbulence models (ELES, SAS, URANS and RANS) for predicting the aerodynamics of freight train container wagons. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2017 Nov 1;170:68–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.008
Heft AI, Indinger T, Adams NA. Introduction of a new realistic generic car model for aerodynamic investigations. SAE Technical Paper. 2012. DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0168
Terra W, et al. A generic cyclist model for aerodynamic investigation: Design, geometry & first aerodynamic analysis of a male time-trial and sprint model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2024 Sep 1;252:105829. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105829
Giannelis NF, Bykerk T, Vio GA. A generic model for benchmark aerodynamic analysis of fifth-generation high-performance aircraft. Aerospace. 2023;10(9):746. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10090746
Bykerk T. A standard model for the investigation of aerodynamic and aerothermal loads on a re-usable launch vehicle. Aerospace Europe Conference 2023. 2023.
Principe E. Il Veicolo Ferroviario. Collegio Ingegneri Ferroviari Italiani, editor. Roma: Collegio Ingegneri Ferroviari Italiani; 2010. 29–31 p.
Baker C, et al. Train aerodynamics: Fundamentals and applications. Cambridge: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2019.
Corniani L, Schito P, Bruni S. A4R-freight-train-model-geometries. [Assessed 8th Sep 2025]. https://github.com/lCornianiPolimi/A4R-Freight-Train-Model-Geometries
Corniani L, Schito P, Bruni S. Aerodynamics of freight trains: An open database of geometries for CFD analyses. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on railway technology: Research, development and maintenance. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp Press; 2024. DOI: 10.4203/ccc.7.3.20
Östh J, Krajnović S. A study of the aerodynamics of a generic container freight wagon using Large-Eddy Simulation. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2014;44:31–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.017
Copyright (c) 2026 Luca Corniani, Paolo Schito, James Bell, Joao Pombo, Stefano Bruni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













