Factors Affecting the Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Freeway Operations – An Exploratory Analysis Using PCEs

Renan Favero; José Reynaldo Setti

doi:10.7307/ptt.v36i1.356

Authors

Renan Favero Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida
José Reynaldo Setti Department of Transportation Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3738-5605

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v36i1.356

Keywords:

autonomous vehicles, passenger car equivalent, decision trees, freeways, microsimulation

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HDVs) will share the roads for a long time, hence the need to study traffic flows mixing AVs and HDVs, especially during the AV introduction period. This paper aims to investigate the roadway and traffic characteristics that affect the impact of AVs on freeway traffic operations, using an adapted version of the HCM6 truck passenger-car equivalent (PCE) methodology. A large number of scenarios comprising different roadway characteristics, AV types and traffic flow compositions were simulated using Vissim to obtain AV PCEs. The results indicated that, for all scenarios considered, an AV has a 20% lower impact on the quality of service and operation than an HDV. A CART decision tree indicated that the most important factors affecting the AVs’ impact on traffic operations are vehicle-to-vehicle connectivity level and the capability of travelling in platoons. Maximum platoon length did not matter, and the increase in the number of traffic lanes reduced the positive impact of AVs on service quality.

References

Bierstedt J, et al. Next-generation vehicles effects on travel demand and highway capacity. Fehr & Peers; 2014. https://issuu.com/fehrandpeers/docs/fp think next gen vehicle white paper final. [Accessed 20th Feb. 2023].

Hancock PA, Nourbakhsh I, Stewart J. On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(16):7684–7691. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805770115.

Calvert SC, Schakel WJ, van Lint J. Will automated vehicles negatively impact traffic flow? Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2017;2017:3082781. DOI: 10.1155/2017/ 3082781.

Tabone W et al. Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2021;9:100293. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100293.

SAE International. Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J3016-201806. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on- road motor vehicles. 2018. https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/J3016_202104/ [Accessed 20th Feb. 2023].

Sukennik P. Micro-simulation guide for automated vehicles. CoEXist. Report Number: D2.5, 2018. https://www.h2020-coexist.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/D2.5-Micro-simulation-guide-for-automated-vehicles.pdf [Accessed 20th Feb. 2023].

TRB. Highway Capacity Manual. 6th ed. Washington: Transportation Research Board; 2016.

Zhou J, Rilett L, Jones E. Estimating passenger car equivalent using the HCM-6 PCE methodology on four-lane level freeway segments in Western U.S. Transportation Research Record. 2019;2673(11):529–545. DOI: 10.1177/0361198119851448.

Favero R, Setti JR. Evaluating the impacts of autonomous cars on the capacity of freeways in Brazil using the HCM-6 PCE methodology. Transportes. 2021;29(2):1–16. DOI: 10.14295/transportes.v29i2. 2444.

Sparrow R, Howard M. When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2017;80:206–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.014.

Shetty A, et al. Safety challenges for autonomous vehicles in the absence of connectivity. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2021;128:103133. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103133.

Harper CD, et al. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly, and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2016;72:1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003.

Van den Berg V, Verhoef E. Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: The effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2016;94:43–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.018.

Alonso E, et al. Economic impact of autonomous vehicles in Spain. European Transport Research Review. 2020;12:59. DOI: 10.1186/S12544-020-00452-4.

Chen Y, Gonder J, Young S, Wood E. Quantifying autonomous vehicles national fuel consumption impacts: A data-rich approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2019;122:134–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.012.

Fountoulakis M, et al. Highway traffic state estimation with mixed connected and conventional vehicles: Microscopic simulation-based testing. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2017;78:13–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.015.

Yu H, et al. Automated vehicle-involved traffic flow studies: A survey of assumptions, models, speculations, and perspectives. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2021;127:103101. DOI: 1016/j.trc.2021.103101.

Olia A, Razavi S, Abdulhai B, Abdelgawad H. Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2018;22(3):244–262. DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2017.1404680.

Van Arem B, et al. The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2006;7(4):429–436. DOI: 10.1109/TITS .2006.884615.

Milanés V, et al. Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2014;15(1):296–305. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2278494.

Shi L, Panos D. Autonomous and connected cars: HCM estimates for freeways with various market penetration rates. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;15:389–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.033.

Adebisi A, et al. Developing highway capacity manual capacity adjustment factors for connected and automated traffic on freeway segments. Transportation Research Record. 2020;2674(10):401–415. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120934797.

Adebisi A, et al. Highway capacity manual capacity adjustment factor development for connected and automated traffic at signalized intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems. 2022;148(3):04021121. DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000631.

List G, Yang B, Rouphail N. On the treatment of trucks for analysis of freeway capacity. Transportation Research Record. 2015;2483(1):120–129. DOI: 10.3141/2483-14.

Sukennik, P. PTV Vissim extension: New features and improvements (Default behavioural parameter sets for AVs. CoEXist. Report number: D2.4, 2018. https://www.h2020-coexist.eu/wp-content/uploads/ 2018/10/D2.4-Vissim-extension-new-features-and-improvements_final.pdf [Accessed 20th Feb. 2023].

Martin-Gasulla M, Sukennik P, Lohmille J. Investigation of the impact on throughput of connected autonomous vehicles with headway based on the leading vehicle type. Transportation Research Record. 2019;2673(5):617–626. DOI: 10.1177/0361198119839989.

Bethonico F, Piva F, Setti JR. Calibration of traffic micro simulators through macroscopic measurements [Calibração de microssimuladores de tráfego através de medidas macroscópicas]. Anais do XXX Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes. Rio de Janeiro: ANPET; 2016. p. 1–12.

Carvalho L, Setti JR. Calibration of the VISSIM truck performance model using GPS data. Transportes. 2019;27(3):31–143. DOI: 10.14295/transportes.v27i3.2042.

Ma X. Using Classification and regression trees: A practical primer. Charlotte: IAP; 2018.

Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1984. DOI: 10.1201/9781315139470.

De Oña J, de Oña R, Calvo F. A classification tree approach to identify key factors of transit service quality. Expert Systems with Applications. 2012;39(12):11164–11171. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03. 037.

Chang L, Wang H. Analysis of traffic injury severity: An application of non-parametric classification tree techniques. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2006;38(5):1019–1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.009.

Abdullah P, Sipos T. Drivers’ behavior and traffic accident analysis using decision tree method. Sustainability. 2022;14(18):11339. DOI: 10.3390/su141811339.

Pitombo C, Kawamoto E, Sousa, A. An exploratory analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns. Transport Policy. 2011;18(2):347–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.010.

[35] Caldas M, Pitombo C, Assirati L. Strategy to reduce the number of parameters to be estimated in discrete choice models: An approach to large choice sets. Travel Behaviour and Society. 2021;25:1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.001.

Pitombo C, Souza A, Lindner A. Comparing decision tree algorithms to estimate intercity trip distribution. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2017;77:16–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.009.

Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd edition. New York: Springer, 2009.

Yang X-B, Zhang N. Effects of the number of lanes on highway capacity. In: Lan H, Yang Y (eds.) Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Harbin, China, 20-22 Aug. 2007. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology Press; 2007.p. 351–356. DOI: 10.1109/ICMSE.2007.4421872.