Mid-Term Revenue Risk Assessment Model for Railway Public-Private Partnership Projects Based on Copula-NPVaR
Downloads
Public-private partnership (PPP) proves to be an effective approach to solving the financing problems of railway construction projects. However, there is a lack of studies on how to control its high revenue risk on financial returns caused by great uncertainties regarding revenue and cost during a long concession period for both the public and private sectors. Few studies focused on the mid-term risk assessment model, and there is still no well-developed mid-term risk assessment mechanism. To fill this research gap, this paper develops a mid-term revenue risk assessment model combining copula and net present value (NPV)-at-risk method. The copula-NPVaR (net present value at risk) model is applied in a numerical case study based on a railway construction project. The results indicate that by means of a copula, the simulated NPVs, under the more reasonable stochastic assumptions of random variables, will approach the real value. This model can be a useful tool to assess the profitability and financial sustainability of the project in the operation period, providing the stakeholders with more reliable and quantitative reference on the revenue risk. This study offers both theoretical foundations and practical suggestions to practitioners that will ultimately promote the adaptive and agile management of railway PPP projects.
Downloads
UN Trade and Development. A world of debt report 2024: a growing burden to global prosperity. 2024. https://unctad.org/publication/world-of-debt#/. [Accessed 7th Jun. 2024].
Xu H. Does government support affect private partners’ profitability in public–private partnerships? Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01723-w.
Yescombe ER. Public-private partnerships: principles of policy and finance. 2011. Elsevier.
Delmon J. Public-private partnership projects in infrastructure: An essential guide for policy makers. 2017. Cambridge University Press.
Jin L, Zhu S, Xu B. The Current status, issues, and countermeasures of railway operations in Zhejiang Province (in Chinese). Wisdom China. 2023;(11):80-82.
Zou PX, Wang S, Fang D. A life‐cycle risk management framework for PPP infrastructure projects. Journal of financial management of property and construction. 2008;13(2):123-142. DOI: 10.1108/13664380810898131.
Bridata. Monthly report of Chinese PPP market, 2023. 2023. http://www.bridata.com/report/detail?id=10682#/. [Accessed 7th Jun. 2024].
Ministry of Finance of China. Guidelines on public-private partnerships performance management. 2020. http://jrs.mof.gov.cn/zhengcefabu/202003/t20200331_3490994.htm#/. [Accessed 7th Jun. 2024].
Akomea-Frimpong I, Jin X, Osei-Kyei R. A holistic review of research studies on financial risk management in public–private partnership projects. Engineering, construction and architectural management. 2021;28(9):2549-2569. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2020-0103.
Le PT, Kirytopoulos K, Chileshe N, Rameezdeen R. Taxonomy of risks in PPP transportation projects: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Construction Management. 2022;22(2):166-181. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1615756.
Liu C. Analysis of practical problems in mid-term assessment of PPP projects (in Chinese). The Chinese Certified Public Accountant. 2020;(05):101-106.
Agarwal D, Deshmukh S, Devkar G. Performance management in public–private partnership projects: a perspective from the Indian road sector. In Research Handbook on Project Performance (pp. 265-279). 2023. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781802207613.00026.
Pellegrino R, Kozlova M, Brandao L, Yeomans JS. Unpacking the role of contextual factors in public support for mitigating revenue risk in public–private partnership projects. In Sensitivity Analysis for Business, Technology, and Policymaking (pp. 93-115). 2024. Routledge.
Eissa R, Abdul Nabi M, El-Adaway IH. Risk–reward share allocation under different integrated project delivery relational structures: a Monte-Carlo simulation and cooperative game theoretic solutions approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2024; 150(4), 04024013. DOI: 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-1318.
Liang Q, Hu H, Wang Z, Hou F. A game theory approach for the renegotiation of Public-Private Partnership projects in Chinese environmental and urban governance industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;238:117952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117952.
Zheng X, et al. Financing mode and scheme decision support for large urban rail transit projects: A revised case-based reasoning approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2024. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-03-2023-0202.
Li X, et al. Identifying critical influencing factors of the value creation of urban rail transit PPP projects in China. Buildings. 2022;12(8):1080. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12081080.
IFAC. Project and Investment Appraisal for Sustainable Value Creation. 2012. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/PAIB-IGPG-ED-Project-and-Investment-Appraisal-for-Sustainable-Value-Creation_0.pdf. [Accessed 7th Jun. 2024].
Ye S, Tiong RL. NPV-at-risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation. Journal of construction engineering and management. 2000;126(3):227-233. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(227).
Zhu Y, Xu F, Hu H. A stochastic concession model for infrastructure projects under build-operate-transfer schemes. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Science). 2016;21(3):320-327. DOI: 10.1007/s12204-016-1728-x.
Kumar L, Jindal A, Velaga NR. Financial risk assessment and modelling of PPP based Indian highway infrastructure projects. Transport Policy. 2018;62:2-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.010.
Biancardi M, Bufalo M, Di Bari A, Villani G. A strategic options game approach to support PPP investment decisions under risk-sharing mechanisms. Annals of Operations Research. 2024;1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06155-6.
Huang Y, Hu H, Chen J, Dai L. Decision making on government subsidy for highway public-private partnership projects in China using an iteration game model. Promet-Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(3):399-412. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i3.3567.
Wang Z, et al. Towards the sustainable development of water security: A new copula-based risk assessment system. Ecological Indicators. 2024;166:112489. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112489.
Ullah H, Akbar M. Bivariate drought risk assessment for water planning using copula function in Balochistan. Environmental Modeling & Assessment. 2023;28(3):447-464. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-023-09880-7.
Chakkalakal L, Hommel U, Li W. Transport infrastructure equities in mixed-asset portfolios: Estimating risk with a Garch-Copula CVaR model. Journal of Property Research. 2018;35(2):117-138. DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2018.1461126.
Hawas F, Cifuentes A. Valuation of projects with minimum revenue guarantees: A Gaussian copula–based simulation approach. The engineering economist. 2017;62(1):90-102. DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2016.1153178.
Mian MA, Vélez-Pareja I. Applicability of the classic WACC concept in practice. Latin American Business Review. 2008;8(2):19-40. DOI: 10.1080/10978520802084123.
Song YJ, Shoji K. Effects of diversification strategies on investment in railway business: The case of private railway companies in Japan. Research in Transportation Economics. 2016;59:388-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2016.07.022.
Mamdoohi S, Miller-Hooks E, Gifford J. An equilibrium approach for compensating public–private partnership concessionaires for reduced tolls during roadway maintenance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2023;175:103759. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103759.
Nelsen RB. Properties and applications of copulas: A brief survey. In Proceedings of the first Brazilian conference on statistical modeling in insurance and finance (pp. 10-28). 2003. University Press USP Sao Paulo, September.
Lu Q, Zhang Y, Harvey JT. Analysis of truck traffic growth for the mechanistic empirical pavement design guide. In Proc. TRB 2007 Annual Meeting. 2007.
Li X, Rashidi TH, Koo TT. Tourists’ travel mode and length of stay: Application of a fully nested Archimedean copula structure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2023;172:103678. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103678.
PRS Legislative Research. Demand for Grants 2025-26 Analysis. 2025. https://prsindia.org/files/budget/budget_parliament/2025/DFG_Analysis_2025-26_Railways.pdf [Accessed 22th Feb. 2025].
Copyright (c) 2026 Guoyong YUE, Yujie HUANG, Zhipeng ZHANG, Hao HU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













