Flight Training Syllabus Structure Impact on Proactive Planning of High-Performance Military Aircraft Pilot Training Operations in Flexible Airspace Structures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v34i6.4158Keywords:
flexible airspace structure, flight training syllabus, high performance military airplanes, proactive planningAbstract
European airspace is marked by fragmentation, and from fragmentation originated congestion. As an answer to congestion, flexible use of airspace is created to fulfil all users’ requirements optimally, and at its very core lies civil-military cooperation and the coordination of airspace use. Such an approach is enabled by collaborative decision-making, which presumes timely and complete exchange of complete relevant information between airspace users. To participate in the process, the military should be transparent regarding its restrictions and capabilities of adaptation to other airspace users’ demands. Flight training syllabus structure and its specific impact on proactive planning of high-performance military aircraft pilot training operations in flexible airspace structures is the subject of this research. Significant diversity in the hourly distribution of civil traffic demand in flexible airspace structures in Zagreb FIR proves them applicable for a proactive approach to high-performance aircraft pilot training operations planning and management. Noticeable reduction in the number of civil aircraft affected by high-performance aircraft pilot training operations in flexible airspace structures at congested flight levels is corroborated. Simulations of proactive planning of high-performance aircraft pilot training operations reveal indications of flight syllabus structure’s impact on pilot flight training duration, as well as the possibility to manage its restrictions.
References
Adler N, Hannay E, Proost S. Managing change in European air traffic control provision. Proceedings of Eleventh USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2015), Lisbon, Portugal. 2015.
2017 Comparison of ATM-related Performance: U.S.-Europe. EUROCONTROL on behalf of the European Union and the Air Traffic Organization System Operations Services of Federal Aviation Administration. 2019.
Steiner S, Mihetec T, Rezo Z. Resolution of operational constrains imposed by fragmentation of European airspace. International Conference Science and Traffic Development ZIRP 2019, Opatija, Croatia. 2019. p. 385-395.
SESAR Joint Undertaking. A proposal for the future architecture of the European airspace. Luxembourg: SESAR Joint Undertaking; 2019.
Europski revizorski sud. Tematsko izvješće Jedinstveno europsko nebo: kultura je promijenjena, ali nije ostvareno jedinstveno nebo. Luxemburg: Europska unija; 2017.
ICAO. Cir 330 Civil-military cooperation in air traffic management. ICAO; 2011.
ICAO. The convention on international civil aviation, Doc 7300/9. ICAO; 2006.
EU (2004) Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. 2004.
EU Regulation (EC)No 1070/2009 of the European parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 amending Regulations (EC)No549/2004, (EC)No550/2004, (EC)No551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system. Official Journal of the European Union. 2009.
Eurocontrol. Guidelines for the implementation of the single European sky by the military. Eurocontrol; 2019.
EU (2005) Commission regulation (EC) No. 2150/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace. Official Journal of the European Union. 2005.
EU (2019) Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/123 of 24 January 2019 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of air traffic management (ATM) network functions and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 677/2011. Official Journal of the European Union. 2019.
Mihetec T, Steiner S, Odić D. Utilization of flexible airspace structure in flight efficiency optimization. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2013;25(2): 109-118. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v25i2.1292.
The Republic of Croatia. Regulation on military airplanes flying. Zagreb: Ministry of Defence. (NN 72/2016).
US Government Accountability Office. Report to congressional committees ready aircrew program air force actions to address congressionally mandated study on combat aircrew proficiency. US Government Accountability Office; 2020.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/707060.pdf.
Mostarac N, Šumanovac D, Novak D. Prediction tool for military flying operations planning. In: Petrović M, Novačko L, Božić D, Rožić T. (eds.) The Science and Development of Transport – ZIRP 2021. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2022. p. 211-222.
HQ USAF. Air force instruction 11–202 vol 1 flying operations aircrew training. Department of the Air Force, USA; 2010.
https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a3/publication/afi11-202v1/afi11-202v1.pdf [Accessed 26th Apr. 2022].
Kozanidis G, Liberopoulos G, Pitsilkas C. Flight and maintenance planning of military aircraft for maximum fleet availability. Mil Operations Research. 2010;15(1): 53-73.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263687210_Flight_and_Maintenance_Planning_of_Military_Aircraft_for_Maximum_Fleet_Availability [Accessed 28th Mar. 2021].
Smith J. Comparative analysis of the USAF F-16 and RAAF. Ph.D. thesis. Walden University; 2017. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4563/ [Accessed 31st Mar. 2021].
Program obuke borbenog osposobljavanja pilota lovačke avijacije. Savezni sekretarijat za narodnu obranu; 1982.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nikola Mostarac, Andrea Reščić, Tomislav Mihetec, Doris Novak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.