Multi-Step Trajectory Prediction of Port Container Trucks Based on CT-HybridNet Model
Downloads
In port environments, container stacking at significant heights obstructs satellite signal reception by terminal equipment on container trucks, leading to inaccurate positional tracking data. To address this, it is necessary to predict container truck trajectories to fill in the inaccurate positioning signals. In this study, we collected port container truck trajectory data and compared the predictive performance of long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and transformer models, revealing performance turning points at different prediction steps. Based on these findings, we propose a hybrid model named CT-HybridNet, which integrates the LSTM-based DeepPBM-M model with the transformer-based PatchTST model. Given the independence of the prediction errors of the two models, we assume both errors follow a Gaussian distribution. By performing an affine transformation, the proposed hybrid method’s output also follows a Gaussian distribution. Additionally, an adaptive parameter adjustment mechanism optimises performance, enabling CT-HybridNet to achieve dual improvements in trajectory prediction accuracy and stability, with 15% improvement in short-term accuracy and 20% in long-term performance. This study provides a more accurate and stable technical solution for port container truck trajectory prediction, overcoming issues related to positioning inaccuracies and signal obstructions.
Downloads
Almeida F. Challenges in the digital transformation of ports. Businesses. 2023;3(4):548–568. DOI: 10.3390/businesses3040034.
Sislian L, Jaegler A, Cariou P. A literature review on port sustainability and ocean carrier network problem. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2016;19:19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.003.
Hua C, et al. Evaluation and governance of green development practice of port: A sea port case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;249:119434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119434.
Wasesa M, Stam A, van Heck E. The seaport service rate prediction system: Using drayage truck trajectory data to predict seaport service rates. Decision Support Systems. 2017;95:37–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.12.002.
Singh A. Trajectory-prediction with vision: A survey. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Paris, France; 1-6 Oct. 2023. p. 3318–3323. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.13354.
Lin CF, Ulsoy AG, LeBlanc DJ. Vehicle dynamics and external disturbance estimation for vehicle path prediction. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2000;8(3):508–518. DOI: 10.1109/87.845881.
Polychronopoulos A, Tsogas M, Amditis AJ, Andreone L. Sensor fusion for predicting vehicles’ path for collision avoidance systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2007;8(3):549–562. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2007.903439.
Anderson C, Vasudevan R, Johnson-Roberson M. A kinematic model for trajectory prediction in general highway scenarios. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2021;6(4):6757–6764. DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3094491.
Gao H, et al. An interacting multiple model for trajectory prediction of intelligent vehicles in typical road traffic scenario. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2021;34(9):6468–6479. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3136866.
Zhang X, Yu W. Research on the application of Kalman filter algorithm in aircraft trajectory analysis. In: 2022 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP). Xi’an, China; 15-17 Apr. 2022. p. 196–199. DOI: 10.1109/ICSP54964.2022.9778746.
Zhang X. Modelling and Identification of Neutrophil Cell Dynamic Behaviour. PhD thesis. University of Sheffield; 2016.
Van Houdt G, Mosquera C, Nápoles G. A review on the long short-term memory model. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2020;53(8):5929–5955. DOI: 10.1007/S10462-020-09838-1.
Ni R, Guo Z, Jiang Y, Liu S. Research on port truck trajectory completion based on long short-term memory model and speed distribution characteristics. In: 2021 7th International Conference on Hydraulic and Civil Engineering & Smart Water Conservancy and Intelligent Disaster Reduction Forum (ICHCE & SWIDR), 7-10 Dec. 2021, Nanjing, China. 2021. p. 1281–1286. DOI: 10.1109/ICHCESWIDR54323.2021.9656235.
Liu S, et al. A spline-LSTM for autonomous truck trajectory prediction based on curve feature extraction. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS). Wuhan, China: IEEE; 2021. p. 1280–1285. DOI: 10.1109/ICTIS54573.2021.9798492.
Yao B, et al. LSTM-based vehicle trajectory prediction using UAV aerial data. In: Proceedings of KES-STS International Symposium. Rome, Italy: Springer; 2023. p. 13–21. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-3284-9.
Li R, Zhong Z, Chai J, Wang J. Autonomous vehicle trajectory combined prediction model based on CC-LSTM. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2022;24(8):3798–3811. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-022-01288-x.
Ip A, Irio L, Oliveira R. Vehicle trajectory prediction based on LSTM recurrent neural networks. In: 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring). Helsinki, Finland: IEEE; 2021. p. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/VTC2021-Spring51267.2021.9449038.
Yu D, Lee H, Kim T, Hwang SH. Vehicle trajectory prediction with lane stream attention-based LSTMs and road geometry linearization. Sensors. 2021;21(23):8152. DOI: 10.3390/s21238152.
Gao Z, Bao M, Gao F, Tang M. Probabilistic multi-modal expected trajectory prediction based on LSTM for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 2023. p. 1-12. DOI: 10.1177/09544070231167906.
Chen J, Fan D, Qian X, Mei L. KGCN-LSTM: A graph convolutional network considering knowledge fusion of point of interest for vehicle trajectory prediction. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. 2023;17(6):1087–1103. DOI: 10.1049/itr2.12341.
Vaswani A, et al. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017;30:5998–6008. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762.
Chen X, et al. Deep reinforcement learning assisted genetic programming ensemble hyper-heuristics for dynamic scheduling of container port trucks. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2024;28(3):456–472. DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2024.3381042.
Danesh Pazho A, Katariya V, Alinezhad Noghre G, Tabkhi H. VT-Former: A transformer-based vehicle trajectory prediction approach for intelligent highway transportation systems. arXiv e-prints. 2023. arXiv:2311.06623. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.06623.
Quintanar Á, Izquierdo R, Parra I, Fernández-Llorca D. Goal-oriented transformer to predict context-aware trajectories in urban scenarios. Engineering Proceedings. 2023;39(1):57. DOI: 10.3390/engproc2023039057.
Geng M, Li J, Xia Y, Chen XM. A physics-informed transformer model for vehicle trajectory prediction on highways. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2023;154:104272. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104272.
Wang Z, et al. Lane transformer: A high-efficiency trajectory prediction model. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2023;4:2–13. DOI: 10.1109/OJITS.2023.3233952.
Xu Y, Wang Y, Peeta S. Leveraging transformer model to predict vehicle trajectories in congested urban traffic. Transportation Research Record. 2023;2677(2):898–909. DOI: 10.1177/03611981221109594.
Chen X, et al. Stochastic non-autoregressive transformer-based multi-modal pedestrian trajectory prediction for intelligent vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2023;24(12):14567–14579. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3342040.
Yang B, et al. A multi-task learning network with a collision-aware graph transformer for traffic-agents trajectory prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2024;25(3):1234–1245. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3345296.
Gao K, et al. Dual transformer based prediction for lane change intentions and trajectories in mixed traffic environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2023;24(6):6203–6216. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2023.3248842.
Ye H, et al. Trajectory prediction of port container trucks based on DeepPBM-Attention. Promet-Traffic & Transportation. 2024;36(3):525–543. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v36i3.420.
Nie Y, Nguyen NH, Sinthong P, Kalagnanam J. A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14730. 2022. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.14730.
Copyright (c) 2025 Haixiong YE, Mingqi GAO, Xiliang ZHANG, Zhe XU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













