Pilot Workload During Walk-around Inspection Based on HRV Features
Downloads
The pre-flight walk-around inspection represents a critical safety procedure in civil aviation; however, its cognitive and physiological workload mechanisms remain underexplored. This study systematically investigated pilot workload during standardised SR20 aircraft inspections by integrating heart rate variability (HRV) feature analysis, expert evaluation and task performance assessment. Forty-one flight students, stratified by training and experience levels, participated under controlled real-aircraft conditions. HRV signals were collected using wearable optical sensors, and multiple time-, frequency- and nonlinear-domain features were extracted. Feature selection was conducted via statistical testing and random forest ranking, identifying mean HR, maximum HR, standard deviation of HR, mean NNI and median NNI as the most workload-sensitive indicators. Six deep learning architectures were developed and compared under two feature-processing strategies: complete HRV features and PCA-reduced features. Results revealed a clear gradient of workload across experience groups, with experienced pilots exhibiting the lowest load and highest task performance, whereas untrained participants demonstrated the highest load. In terms of classification, the Depthwise CNN achieved the best overall performance (accuracy = 0.9372) with full HRV features, while the CNN-GRU hybrid was most effective (accuracy = 0.9186) after PCA reduction. These findings highlight the importance of aligning feature dimensionality with model architecture and provide an empirical foundation for establishing objective workload monitoring frameworks in aviation safety management.
Downloads
International Civil Aviation Organization. Annex 6: Operation of Aircraft. Montreal: ICAO;2024.
Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC). Regulations on the Operational Certification of Public Air Transport Carriers Using Large Aircraft (CCAR-121-R5). Beijing: CAAC;2020.
Federal Aviation Administration. FAR Part 91: General Operating and Flight Rules. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.2023.
Shappell S A, Wiegmann D A. The human factors analysis and classification system-HFACS. (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine;2000.
National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft accident report: Alaska Airlines Flight 1282. Washington, DC: NTSB;2024.
Skybrary. Maintenance workload [Internet]. Available from: https://skybrary.aero/articles/maintenance-workload
Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research//Advances in psychology. North-Holland, 1988;52:139-183. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9.
Vidulich MA, Tsang PS. Techniques of subjective workload assessment: a comparison of SWAT and the NASA-Bipolar methods. Ergonomics, 1986;29(11),1385-1398. DOI: 10.1080/00140138608967253.
Masi G, et al. Stress and workload assessment in aviation—a narrative review. Sensors, 2023;23(7):3556. DOI: 10.3390/s23073556.
Luzzani G, et al. A review of physiological measures for mental workload assessment in aviation. Aeronautical Journal, 2024;128(1323):928-949. DOI: 10.1017/aer.2023.101.
Malik M. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use: task force of the European society of cardiology and the North American society for pacing and electrophysiology. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 1996;1(2),151-181. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474x.1996.tb00275.x.
Wang P, Houghton R, Majumdar A. Detecting and predicting pilot mental workload using heart rate variability: a systematic review. Sensors, 2024;24(12):3723. DOI: 10.3390/s24123723.
Alaimo A, et al. Aircraft pilots workload analysis: heart rate variability objective measures and NASA-task load index subjective evaluation. Aerospace, 2020;7(9):137. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace7090137.
Mohanavelu K, et al. Cognitive workload analysis of fighter aircraft pilots in flight simulator environment. Defence Science Journal, 2020;70(2). DOI: 10.14429/dsj.70.14539.
Mansikka H, et al. Fighter pilots’ heart rate, heart rate variation and performance during instrument approaches. Ergonomics, 2016;59(10):1344-1352. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1136699.
Koskelo J, et al. Cardiac autonomic responses in relation to cognitive workload during simulated military flight. Applied Ergonomics, 2024;121:104370. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104370.
Cao X, et al. Heart rate variability and performance of commercial airline pilots during flight simulations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health, 2019;16(2):237. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16020237.
Park JH, et al. How is the pilot doing: VTOL pilot workload estimation by multimodal machine learning on psycho-physiological signals.//2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN). IEEE, 2024;2311-2318. DOI: 10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731202.
Zhu W, et al. Assessment of pilot mental workload based on physiological signals: A real helicopter cross-country flight study//2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT). IEEE, 2023;638-643. DOI: 10.1109/iccasit58768.2023.10351548.
Navalta JW, et al. Heart rate processing algorithms and exercise duration on reliability and validity decisions in biceps-worn Polar Verity Sense and OH1 wearables. Scientific Reports, 2023;13(1),11736. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38329-w.
Takahashi M, et al. Cardiac parasympathetic outflow during dynamic exercise in humans estimated from power spectral analysis of P–P interval variability. Experimental Physiology,2016;101(3):397-409. DOI: 10.1113/ep085420.
Marathon Handbook. Heart rate variability [Internet]. Available from: https://marathonhandbook.com/heart-rate-variability/
Champseix R, Ribiere L, Le Couedic C. A python package for heart rate variability analysis and signal preprocessing. Journal of Open Research Software, 2021;9(1). DOI: 10.5334/jors.305.
Lipponen JA, Tarvainen MP. A robust algorithm for heart rate variability time series artefact correction using novel beat classification. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 2019;43(3):173-181. DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2019.1640306.
Yang S, et al. The impacts of temporal variation and individual differences in driver cognitive workload on ECG-based detection. Human Factors, 2021;63(5):772-787. DOI: 10.1177/0018720821990484.
Hurd KD, et al. Effectiveness of simulation-based training for obstetric internal medicine: Impact of cognitive load and emotions on knowledge acquisition and retention. Obstetric Medicine, 2021;14(4):242-247. DOI: 10.1177/1753495x211011915.
Paris F, et al. Differences between experts and novices in the use of aircraft maintenance documentation: evidence from eye tracking. Applied Sciences, 2024;14(3):1251. DOI: 10.3390/app14031251.
FasterCapital. Aviation Training Research: Cognitive Load Management in Flight Training—Strategies and Challenges [Internet]. Available from: https://www.fastercapital.com/content/Aviation-Training-Research--Cognitive-Load-Management-in-Flight-Training--Strategies-and-Challenges.html
Altmann A, et al. Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics, 2010;26(10):1340-1347. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134.
Mahdavi N, et al. Unraveling the interplay between mental workload, occupational fatigue, physiological responses and cognitive performance in office workers. Scientific Reports, 2024;14(1):17866. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68889-4.
Mund D, Schulte A. Experimental evaluation of heart-based workload measures as related to their suitability for real-time applications//International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020;372-382. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_27.
Sammito S, et al. Guideline for the application of heart rate and heart rate variability in occupational medicine and occupational health science. Journal of Occupational Medicine & Toxicology, 2024;19(1):15. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-024-00414-9.
Kim HG, et al. Stress and heart rate variability: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Psychiatry Investigation, 2018;15(3):235-245.
Maggi P, Di Nocera F. Sensitivity of the spatial distribution of fixations to variations in the type of task demand and its relation to visual entropy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2021;15:642535. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.642535.
Howard AG, et al. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861:2017. DOI: 10.1201/9781351003827-3.
Haase D, Amthor M. Rethinking depthwise separable convolutions: How intra-kernel correlations lead to improved mobilenets//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2020;14600-14609. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01461.
Ding X, et al. Scaling up your kernels to 31x31: Revisiting large kernel design in cnns//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2022;11963-11975. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01166.
Zihlmann M, Perekrestenko D, Tschannen M. Convolutional recurrent neural networks for electrocardiogram classification//2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). IEEE, 2017;1-4. DOI: 10.22489/cinc.2017.070-060.
Chung J, et al. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555,2014.
Xu G, et al. Development of skip connection in deep neural networks for computer vision and medical image analysis: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01725,2024.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jiajun Yuan, Ligang WANG, Lu TIAN, Haotian QIAO, Qin DONG

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













