Institutional Theory and Digital Maturity – A Framework for Analysing the Digital Transformation of the Transport Sector
Downloads
This paper analyses the digitalisation of the transport sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina through the theoretical frameworks of institutional theory, the resource-based view (RBV) and the concept of digital maturity. The study, conducted on a sample of 85 transport companies, aimed to examine the role of institutional pressures and internal capacities in the implementation of digital technologies, with particular emphasis on smart tachographs as a key regulatory and technological driver of digital transformation. Smart tachographs, together with telematics and navigation systems, are considered indicators of the digital maturity level of transport companies. The results show that legislation remains the main driver of digitalisation, supporting institutional theory, while companies with higher levels of digital maturity are more likely to recognise strategic benefits such as efficiency improvements, data-driven decision-making and advanced analytics. The findings also suggest that the intensive use of tachograph and telematics data contributes to the development of organisational competencies that represent valuable and hard-to-imitate resources, consistent with RBV. The paper contributes by linking institutional pressures and digital maturity and by introducing the concept of the “digital stack”, while the practical implications highlight the need to strengthen internal digital capacities beyond regulatory compliance.
Downloads
Jerković D, Gavrić T, Ljubas Ćurak J. Digital transformation in Bosnia and Herzegovina companies: Analysis of the degree of integration and impact on business. Economy and Market Communication Review. 2024;14(1):116-139. Available from: https://emc-review.com/Pages%20from%20EMC%20-%20godina%20XIV_broj%201%20WEB-8.pdf
Verhoef PC, et al. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 2021 Jan;122:889-901. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.
Kryukov V, Sidorov E, Tashenov S, Tokareva N. Readiness of transport enterprises for digital transformation. Transportation Research Procedia. 2022;63:2937-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.333.
Matt C, Hess T, Benlian A. Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2015;57(5):339-343. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.
Apanavičienė R, Shahrabani MMN. Key factors affecting smart building integration into smart city: Technological aspects. Smart Cities. 2023;6(4):1724-1744. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities6040086.
Winkelhaus S, Grosse EH. Logistics 4.0: A systematic review towards a new logistics system. International Journal of Production Research. 2020;58(1):18-43. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1612964.
Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B. The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research. 2019;57(3):829-846. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086.
Barreto L, Amaral A, Pereira T. Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: An overview. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017;13:1245-1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.043.
Kern J. The digital transformation of logistics: A review about technologies and their implementation status. In: The digital transformation of logistics. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/9781119646495.ch25.
Baldini G, Chiaramello M. Regulated applications for the road transportation infrastructure: The case of the smart tachograph in the EU. Internatonal Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. 2018;21:3-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2017.12.004.
D’Emidio M, et al. Route planning algorithms for fleets of connected vehicles: State of the art, implementation, and deployment. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(7):2884. DOI: 10.3390/app14072884.
Kaushik S. Transforming fleet operations with artificial intelligence: A strategic and practical perspective. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology. 2025;7(4):1-7.
Koval V, Polcyn J, Senkus P, Vovk O. Digital maturity of logistics processes assessed in the areas of technological support for performance measurement, employees, and process management. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(17):7893. DOI: 10.3390/app14177893.
DiMaggio P, Powell W. Coercive, normative and mimetic pressures as drivers of environmental management accounting adoption. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4506. DOI: 10.3390/su12114506.
European Commission. Tachograph. Brussels: European Commission; [Accessed 2025 Feb 23]. Available from: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-modes/road/tachograph_en
Elia S, Margherita A, Passiante G. Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the drivers of digitalization. Journal of Business Research. 2021;129:135-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.045.
Van Hoang D. Digital capabilities and sustainable competitive advantages. SAGE Open. 2025;15(1). DOI: 10.1177/21582440251329967.
Aglehori R, Gabler CB. Pursuing competitive advantages in the interactive digital era. Int Journal Bus Strat Innov. 2024;6(2):45-62.
Šego A. Digitalni tahograf i njegova primjena u Bosni i Hercegovini. Zbornik radova Internacionalnog univerziteta Travnik. 2017;6(15):658-663. Available from: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1347641
Karić F. Digitalni tahografi u Bosni i Hercegovini sa osvrtom na EU. U: XI međunarodno savjetovanje Saobraćajni i ekološki problemi država u tranziciji s aspekta integracije u Evropsku uniju. Travnik: Internacionalni univerzitet Travnik; 2015. p. 360-7.
Borić J, Štrk H, Vilke S. Tachograph – Monitoring device for greater road traffic safety. Pomorski zbornik. 2024;64(1):177-188. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/318972.
Baldini G, Chiaramello M. DSRC CAN interface specification for the Smart Tachograph application (Version 1.5). EUR 31048 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2022. DOI: 10.2760/170632.
Suchanek M. The costs of retrofitting smart tachographs in HDVs in the European Union. Transport Economic and Logistics. 2018;77:125-130. DOI: 10.26881/etil.2018.77.12.
European Parliament. Retrofitting smart tachographs by 2020: costs and benefits. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service; 2018. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2018)615643
Borio D, Cano E, Baldini G. Speed consistency in the smart tachograph. Sensors. 2018;18(5):1583. DOI: 10.3390/s18051583.
Baldini G, Giuliani R, Gemo M, Naessens V. On the application of sensor authentication with intrinsic physical features to vehicle security. Transport Economic and Logistics. 2021;91:107053. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107053.
Kuo HM, Chen TL, Yang CS. The effects of institutional pressures on shipping digital transformation in Taiwan. Maritime Business Review. 2022;7(2):175-191. DOI: 10.1108/MABR-04-2021-0030.
Golińska-Dawson P, Werner-Lewandowska K, Kolińska K, Koliński A. Impact of market drivers on the digital maturity of logistics processes in a supply chain. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3120. DOI: 10.3390/su15043120.
Suhail Al Mazroui TS, et al. Maturity of digital transformation in the shipping industry: Case study among enterprises in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 2023;20(1):115-123. DOI: 10.14710/kapal.v20i1.51246.
Coşkun AE, Erturgut R. Does institutionalization enhance logistics performance in international businesses? A moderated and mediated model. Operations Management Research. 2025;18:1045-1066. DOI: 10.1007/s12063-025-00542-3.
Čižiūnienė K, Viduto M, Petraška A, Jarašūnienė A. The impact of the mobility package on the development of sustainability in logistics companies: The case of Lithuania. Sustainability. 2025;17(15):6947. DOI: 10.3390/su17156947.
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). HIMSS digital health indicator: A framework for measuring digital health transformation. 2023. Available from: https://www.himss.org
Deloitte. Digital banking maturity 2023: Global edition. 2023. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com
Tiwana A. Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann; 2014.
Bresnahan TF, Greenstein S. Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. Journal of Industrial Economics. 1999;47(1):1-40. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6451.00088.
Nguyen TNL, et al. Factors leading to the digital transformation dead zone in shipping SMEs. Sustainability. 2025;17(12):5553. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5553
Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). 2018.Sage Publications.
Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). 2003. Routledge.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3),297-334. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555.
Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization. 2018;28(1):52-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.
OECD. Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021. DOI: 10.1787/589b283f-en.
Schumacher A, Erol S, Sihn W. A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP. 2016;52:161-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ana ŠEGO, Maja GAKIĆ, Mario ŠAKIĆ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













