Decade of Monitoring Road Safety Performance Indicators in the Republic of Serbia (2013–2022) – Lessons That We Learned
Downloads
Road safety performance indicators (RSPI) provide essential insight into traffic safety beyond crash statistics, enabling a better understanding of risk factors and policy impacts. In this sense, it is important to determine how RSPIs are related to the outcomes of traffic crashes. This point was the aim of this research, which used data from the ten-year experience of monitoring RSPI in Serbia. Monitoring of road safety performance indicators began in 2013 at the level of 27 police administration units. The relationship between RSPI and the outcomes of traffic crashes was investigated by applying fixed-effects regressions and Mundlak correlated random-effects models for panel data. Results showed that the most significant relationships were observed in the RSPI of protective systems in vehicles (seatbelts, child restraint systems and helmets) and speeding in urban areas. On the other side, speed-related indicators in rural areas and indicators related to distraction had weaker associations with the outcomes of traffic crashes. The set of constructs obtained from observed RSPI explained around 37% of the variability in the total weighted number of traffic crash casualties, highlighting the need to include indicators from all other groups. The findings highlight the methodological and policy value of sustained RSPI monitoring and suggest improvements in indicator design, especially for vulnerable road users, distraction and emerging mobility modes. Finally, the study’s results confirm the importance of monitoring and incorporating indicators from all groups to describe the road safety situation in a local entity accurately.
Downloads
Pešić D. Development and improvement of methods for assessing the level of road safety in a given area. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering; 2012. DOI: 10.2298/bg20121128pesic.
European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). Ranking EU progress on road safety. Brussels; 2023. https://www.etsc.eu/pin.
Silverans P, Vanhove S. Baseline conclusions and recommendations. Brussels: Vias institute, 2023.
S, Gitelman V. Road Safety Performance Indicators: Manual. Deliverable D3.8 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. 2007.
Hauer E, Bonneson J. An empirical examination of the relationship between speed and road accidents based on data by Elvik, Christensen and Amundsen. 2006.
Elvik R, Christensen P, Amundsen AH. Speed and road accidents: An evaluation of the Power Model. Institute of Transport Economics (TØI). Report number: 740/2004, 2004.
Aljanahi AAM, Rhodes AH, Metcalfe AV. Speed, speed limits and road traffic accidents under free flow conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention 1999;31:161–168. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00058-X.
Lave CA. Speeding, coordination, and the 55 mph limit. American Economic Review 1985;75:1159–1164.
Smailović E, et al. Effects of building a bypass highway on road safety: A case study of a rural road in Serbia. 8th Road Safety and Simulation International Conference. 2022. p. 6–8. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.6238810.
Shinar D. Traffic safety and human behavior. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/9780080555874.
World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2015. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Global 2015;340.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic safety facts 2014 Crash Data Key Findings. 2015.
Jost G, Allsop R, Ceci A. Ranking EU progress on car occupant safety. European Transport Safety Council (ETSC): Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
Stutts J, et al. Distractions in everyday driving. No. HS-043 573. 2003.
Eksler V. Measuring and understanding road safety performance at local territorial level. Safety Science. 2010;48:1197–1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.010.
Transport Community. Technical Assistance for collecting Road Safety KPIs on Seatbelt and Child Restraint Systems in the Western Balkans region (WESTBELT): Final report. Belgrade; 2024. https://www.transport-community.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Final-Report-Westbelt_ONLINE.pdf
Lipovac K, Vujanić M, Tešić M. Road safety performance indicators in the local community with the method of application. 7th International conference “Road Safety in Local Communities”. Donji Milanovac, Serbia, 2012. p. 117–123.
Tešić M, et al. Identifying the most significant indicators of the total road safety performance index. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2018;113:263–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.003.
United Nations Department of Safety and Security. (2019). Road Safety Strategy: For the United Nations System and its Personnel. New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2020/09/road_safety_strategy_booklet.pdf
Tingvall C, Haworth N. Vision zero-an ethical approach to safety and mobility. 6th ITE international conference road safety & traffic enforcement: Beyond 2000. 1999.
Yannis G, Evgenikos P, Chaziris A, Pace JF. Building the European road safety observatory. SafetyNet. D.1.14 CADaS. 2008. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48340839.
Glavić D, et al. Contribution to accident prediction models development for rural two-lane roads in Serbia. Promet – Traffic & Transportation. 2016;28:415–424. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v28i4.1908.
Nazif-Munoz JI, Nikolic N. The effectiveness of child restraint and seat belt legislation in reducing child injuries: The case of Serbia. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2018;19:S7–S14. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1387254.
Pljakić M, Jovanović D, Matović B. The influence of traffic-infrastructure factors on pedestrian accidents at the macro-level: The geographically weighted regression approach. Journal of Safety Research. 2022;83:248–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.021.
Rosić M, et al. Method for selection of optimal road safety composite index with examples from DEA and TOPSIS method. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2017;98:277–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.007.
Stanojević P, et al. Effectiveness of implementing a graduated driver licensing (GDL) law among young Serbian drivers. Journal of Safety Research. 2022;83:339–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.09.008.
Tešić M, et al. Star rating of driver’s behavior as a tool to prevent risky behavior. Transport Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2023;97:214–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2023.07.011.
PIARC. Road safety manual: Recommendations from the world road association (PIARC), Chapter 7. Route2 Market, 2001. https://roadsafety.piarc.org/en
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1998;80:549–560. DOI: 10.1162/003465398557825.
Hoechle D. Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal. 2007;7:281–312. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X070070030.
Wooldridge JM. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage, 2018.
Mundlak Y. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica. 1978;46(1):69–85. DOI: 10.2307/1913646.
Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT press, 2010.
DeCoster J. Overview of factor analysis. 1998. http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html [Accessed 26 June 2022]
Comrey AL, Lee HB. Interpretation and application of factor analytic results. In Ed. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Psychology Press: 1992.
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39–50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312.
DiStefano C, Zhu M, Mîndrilã D. Understanding and using factor scores: considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2009;14:20. DOI: 10.7275/da8t-4g52.
Thurstone LL. The vectors of mind: Multiple-factor analysis for the isolation of primary traits. University of Chicago Press:1935.
Sukumar GM, et al. Helmet protection paradox for powered two-wheeler users: Concerns in data misinterpretation and need for improved data systems. The Journal of Neuroscience in Rural Practices. 2025;16:280–283. DOI: 10.25259/JNRP_266_2024.
Road Traffic Safety Agency Republic of Serbia. Average age of passenger cars in the Republic of Serbia in 2022. 2025. https://www.abs.gov.rs/static/uploads/13310_starost-putnickih-automobila-2022.pdf [accessed 6 November 2025]
International Transport Forum. Road safety annual report 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. https://www.itf-oecd.org/road-safety-annual-report-2023
Serbian Government. Serbian road safety strategy - 2023-2030 (Стратегија безбедности саобраћаја Републике Србије за период од 2023. до 2030. године са акционим планом за 2023. до 2025. године). Serbia, 2023.
Bíl M, Bílová M, Müller I. Critical factors in fatal collisions of adult cyclists with automobiles. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42:1632–1636. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.001.
Haleem K, Alluri P, Gan A. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2015;81:14–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.025.
Salon D, McIntyre A. Determinants of pedestrian and bicyclist crash severity by party at fault in San Francisco, CA. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2018; 110: 149–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.007.
Stiles J, Miller H. The built environment and the determination of fault in urban pedestrian crashes: Toward a systems-oriented crash investigation. Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2024; 17: 97–113. DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.2024.2335.
Ulfarsson GF, Kim S, Booth KM. Analyzing fault in pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes in North Carolina. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42:1805–1813. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.001.
Rella Riccardi M, et al. Analysis of contributory factors of fatal pedestrian crashes by mixed logit model and association rules. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 2023;30:195–209. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2022.2116647.
Elliott MA, Baughan CJ, Sexton BF. Errors and violations in relation to motorcyclists’ crash risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007;39:491–499. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.012.
Savolainen P, Mannering F. Probabilistic models of motorcyclists’ injury severities in single- and multi-vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007;39:955–963. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.016.
Jones S, Gurupackiam S, Walsh J. Factors influencing the severity of crashes caused by motorcyclists: Analysis of data from Alabama. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2013;139:949–956. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000570.
Cummings P, Wells JD, Rivara FP. Estimating seat belt effectiveness using matched-pair cohort methods. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2003;35(1):143-149. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00087-2.
Eluru N, Bhat CR. A joint econometric analysis of seat belt use and crash-related injury severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007;39:1037–1049. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.001.
Arbogast KB, et al. An evaluation of the effectiveness of forward facing child restraint systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2004;36:585–589. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00065-4.
Ma X, et al. Effectiveness of booster seats compared with no restraint or seat belt alone for crash injury prevention. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013;20:880–887. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12204.
Rice TM, Anderson CL. The effectiveness of child restraint systems for children aged 3 years or younger during motor vehicle collisions: 1996 to 2005. American Journal of Public Health. 2009;99:252–257. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131128.
Road Traffic Safety Agency. Data from Unique Road Traffic Safety Database [Statistics], https://bazaabs.abs.gov.rs/absPortal/ (2025, accessed 15 September 2025).
Copyright (c) 2026 Dalibor PEŠIĆ, Krsto LIPOVAC, Boris ANTIĆ, Jelica ŠĆEKIĆ, Nenad MARKOVIĆ, Emir SMAILOVIĆ, Radomir M. MIJAILOVIĆ, Đorđe PETROVIĆ, Filip FILIPOVIĆ, Andrijana PEŠIĆ, Bojana MILJKOVIĆ, Mladen KOVAČ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.













