Evaluation of Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalised Intersections from the Elderly Perspective

Authors

  • Huiling Zhang Transportation School, Chongqing Jiaotong University
  • Dekai Zhang Qingdao Municipal Engineering Design Research Institute
  • Ruihao Wang Transportation School, Chongqing Jiaotong University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i3.130

Keywords:

urban traffic, pedestrian level of service, fuzzy linear regression, signalised intersection, elderly pedestrian

Abstract

The crossing decisions and behaviour of elderly pedestrians are affected by the pedestrian level of service (PLOS). In this paper, an evaluation model was established to analyse the relationship between the traffic environment and the perceived evaluation of elderly pedestrians. Firstly, the characteristic parameters of the selected intersections and the perceived evaluation data of elderly pedestrians at the synchronisation scenery were extracted using manual recording and questionnaire-based truncation methods. The correlation between the perceived evaluation data of elderly pedestrians and the traffic parameters were tested with respect to the dimensions of safety, convenience and efficiency. Then, the significant parameters affecting PLOS were recognised. Based on the traffic characteristic parameters, the PLOS evaluation model from the elderly perspective was established using the fuzzy linear regression method. PLOS classification thresholds were obtained using the fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm. The data from two intersections were used to validate the model. The results show that the difference between the actual and the predicted PLOS values of the two crosswalks were 0.2 and 0.1, respectively. Thus, the proposed PLOS evaluation model in this paper can be used to accurately predict the PLOS from the elderly perspective using the traffic data of signalised intersections.

References

National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Communiqué of the PRC on the 2021 National Economic and Social Development. 2021. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202202/t20220227_1827960.html. [Accessed 20th Jan. 2021].

Lu SD, Xu ZQ, Wu XF. Analysis of travel characteristics of the elderly in Nanchang. Proceedings of the 2017 Annual National Planning Conference, 9 Jun. 2017, Shanghai, China. 2017. p. 2312-2319.

Tournier I, Dommes A, Cavallo V. Review of safety and mobility issues among older pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2016;91:24-35. DOI: 10.1016/J.AAP.2016.02.031.

Vieira E, et al. Temporo-spatial gait parameters during street crossing conditions: A comparison between younger and older adults. Gait & Posture. 2015;41(2):510-515. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.001.

Avineri E, Shinar D, Susilo Y. Pedestrians’ behaviour in crosswalks: the effects of fear of falling and age. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2012;44(1):30-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.028.

Zito GA. Cazzoli D, Scheffler L. Street crossing behavior in younger and older pedestrians: An eye- and head-tracking study. BMC Geriatrics. 2015;15(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-015-0175-0.

Dommes A, et al. Crossing a two-way street: comparison of young and old pedestrians. Journal of Safety Research. 2014;50:27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.03.008.

Feng ZX, Ji NY, Luo Y, Zhao C. Questionnaire survey-based evaluation of public traffic safety awareness. China Journal of Highway and Transport. 2020;33(06):212-223. DOI: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2020.06.020.

Loo BPY, Tsui KL. Contributory factors to critically wrong road-crossing judgements among older people: An integrated research study. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;23(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1177/102490791602300102.

Dommes A, Cavallo V. The role of perceptual, cognitive, and motor abilities in street‐crossing decisions of young and older pedestrians. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2011;31(3):292-301. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00835.x.

Knoblauch RL, Pietrucha MT, Nitzburg M. Field studies of pedestrian walking speed and start-up time. Transportation Research Record. 1996;1538(1):27-38. DOI: 10.3141/1538-04.

Transportation Research Board. Highway capacity manual 2010. Washington: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council; 2010.

Banerjee A, et al. A review of pedestrian flow characteristics and level of service over different pedestrian facilities. Collective Dynamics. 2018;3(A17):1-52. DOI: 10.17815/CD.2018.17.

Lee JY, Goh PK, Lam WH. New level-of-service standard for signalized crosswalks with bi-directional pedestrian flows. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2005;131(12):957-960. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:12(957).

Bansal A, Gayal T, Sharma U. Level of service of pedestrian facilities in an urban area (a critical evaluation of factors). Journal of Engineering Technology. 2018;7:416-434. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333668531 [Accessed 20th Jan. 2021].

Petritsch TA, et al. Level-of-service model for pedestrians at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record. 2005;1939(1):54-62. DOI: 10.1177/0361198105193900107.

Hubbard SM, Bullock DM, Mannering FL. Right turns on green and pedestrian level of service: Statistical assessment. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2009;135(4):153-159. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:4(153).

Bian Y, et al. Pedestrians’ level of service at signalized intersections in China. Transportation Research Record. 2009;2114(1):83-89. DOI: 10.3141/2114-10.

Nagraj R, Vedaipi P. Modeling pedestrian delay and level of service at signalized intersection crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. Transportation Research Record. 2013;2394(1):70-76. DOI: 10.3141/2394-09.

Zhang L, Prevedouros P. Signalized intersection level of service incorporating safety risk. Transportation Research Record. 2003;1852(1):77-86. DOI: 10.3141/1852-11.

Steinman N, Hines DK. A methodology to assess design features for pedestrian and bicyclist crossings at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record. 2004;1878(1):42-50. DOI: 10.3141/1878-06.

Ling Z, et al. Evaluating pedestrian level of service at signalized intersections in China: Intercept survey method. Transportation Research Record. 2015;2519(1):75-84. DOI: 10.3141/2519-09.

Marisamynathan S, Vedagiri R. Modeling pedestrian level of service at signalized intersection under mixed traffic conditions. Transportation Research Record. 2017;2634(1):86-94. DOI: 10.3141/2634-13.

Jensen S, Ren U. Pedestrian and bicycle level of service at intersections, roundabouts, and other crossings. 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 13-17 Jan. 2013, Washington DC, USA. 2013. p. 43-51. https://trid.trb.org/view/1240737. [Accessed 20th Jan. 2021].

Ahmed T, et al. A new pedestrian crossing level of service (PCLOS) method for promoting safe pedestrian crossing in urban areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(16):1-20. DOI: 10.3390/IJERPH18168813.

Transportation Research Board. Highway capacity manual 2016. Washington: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council; 2016.

Nowar R, Burke MI. What are the most important factors for pedestrian level-of-service estimation? A systematic review of the literature. Transportation Research Record. 2018;2672(35):101-117. DOI: 10.1177/0361198118790623.

Chen Y, Wei LL. Parameter estimation of the fuzzy logistic regressive model with LR typed fuzzy coefficients. Operations Research and Fuzziology. 2016;6(1):27-35. DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2016.61004.

Wang HD, Guo SC, Yue LZ. An approach to fuzzy multiple linear regression model based on the structured element theory. System Engineering Theory and Practice. 2014;34(10):2628-2636. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2014)10-2628.

Chen F. Research on pedestrian-vehicle conflict discrimination and resolution at crosswalk for autonomous vehicles. M.Eng. thesis. Wuhan University of Technology; 2019.

Hubbard SM, Bullock DM, Mannering FL. Right turns on green and pedestrian level of service: Statistical assessment. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2009;135(4):153-159. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:4(153).

Zhao J, Zheng Z, Hang Y. Delay and optimal cycle length model for tandem intersections. China Journal of Highway and Transport. 2019;(03):135-144. DOI: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2019.03.015.

He YQ. Study on pedestrian traffic organization methods of signalized intersection on urban arterial. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology; 2006.

Liu GX, Li KP, Sun J. Research on pedestrians waiting time at signal control intersection. China Safety Science Journal. 2009;19(09):159-166+179. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2009.09.026.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2023

How to Cite

Zhang, H., Zhang, D., & Wang, R. (2023). Evaluation of Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalised Intersections from the Elderly Perspective. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 35(3), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i3.130

Issue

Section

Articles