Asymmetric Behaviour and Traffic Flow Characteristics of Expressway Merging Area in China

Weihua Zhang; Siping Wei; Changsheng Wang; Meng Qiu

doi:10.7307/ptt.v35i1.4200

Authors

Weihua Zhang School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology
Siping Wei School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology
Changsheng Wang School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology
Meng Qiu School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i1.4200

Keywords:

expressway, merging area, asymmetric behaviour, driver response mode, traffic hysteresis, capacity

Abstract

Drivers show different characteristics in traffic oscillations. These differences reflect the driver’s driving style, which is an important part of traffic uncertainty. This paper deeply explores the driving characteristics in asymmetric driving behaviour and its influence on traffic flow characteristics. The aim is to improve the understanding of safe driving. Continuous vehicle trajectories under various traffic flow conditions in an expressway merging area are obtained by aerial photography. Image processing technology is used to extract the basic parameters of traffic flow and vehicle operating characteristic data. Based on the measured data, the driver’s response mode is subdivided into multiple sub-modes. On the basis of this study, the types and distribution of traffic hysteresis and the impact of asymmetric behaviour on merging area capacity are further revealed. The results show that the response coefficient will increase for 58.72 % drivers during the process of experiencing oscillation disturbance to rebalance. The traffic hysteresis caused by driver’s asymmetric following behaviour in an expressway merging area is generally positive. This reduces the bottleneck outflow rate of the merging area by about 7 % on average. This study has important practical significance in analysing the formation mechanism of traffic congestion and adopting effective protective measures.

References

Sun P, Wang X, Zhu M. Modeling Car-Following Behavior on Freeways Considering Driving Style. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems. 2021;147(12). DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000584.

Suh J, Yeo H. An empirical study on the traffic state evolution and stop-and-go traffic development on freeways. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science. 2016;12(1): 80-97. DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2015.1101508.

Kordani AA, Saffarzadeh M, Salehikalam A. Identifying and analyzing stop and go traffic based on asymmetric theory of driving behavior in acceleration and deceleration. International Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2016;3(4): 237-252. DOI: 10.22119/IJTE.2016.16170.

Park M, Kim Y, Yeo H. Development of an Asymmetric car-following model and simulation validation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2020;21(8): 3513-3524. DOI: 10.1109/tits.2019.2930320.

Newell GF. Instability in dense highway traffic: A review. 1965; p. 9-54.

Hao Xu, et al. Modeling the asymmetry in traffic flow (a): Microscopic approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2013;37(22). DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.037.

Wang K, et al. Research on Car-Following Model considering Driving Style. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022;2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7215697.

Suh J, Yeo H. A study on the wave development and evolution characteristics of stop-and-go traffic. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2011.

Li X-C. Modeling and analysis of car-following behavior considering the asymmetry [考虑非对称特性的车辆跟驰行为建模与分析]. Master Degree Thesis. Southwest Jiaotong University; 2019.

Qian, et al. Using asymmetric theory to identify heterogeneous drivers’ behavior characteristics through traffic oscillation. IEEE Access. 2019;7: 106284-106294. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930762.

Chen D, et al. Microscopic traffic hysteresis in traffic oscillations: A behavioral perspective. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2012;46(10): 1440-1453. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.07.002.

Wei D, Liu H. Analysis of asymmetric driving behavior using a self-learning approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2013;47: 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.09.003.

Newell GF. Theories of instability in dense highway traffic. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan. 1962;1(5): 9-54.

Yeo H, Skabardonis A. Understanding stop-and-go traffic in view of asymmetric traffic theory. Transportation & Traffic Theory. 1970.

Wong GCK, Wong SC. A multi-class traffic flow model – an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2002;36(9): 827-841. DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(01)00042-8.

Ahn S, et al. A method to account for non-steady state conditions in measuring traffic hysteresis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2013;34: 138-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.05.020.

Laval JA. Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: An improved measurement method. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2011;45(2): 385-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.07.006.

Li X, et al. An improved car-following model considering the influence of space gap to the response. Physical A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 2018;509: 536-545. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.069.

Chen D, et al. A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2012;46(6): 744-761. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.01.009.

Chen D, et al. On the periodicity of traffic oscillations and capacity drop: the role of driver characteristics. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2014;59: 117-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.11.005.

Yang X, et al. Biomechanics analysis of human walking with load carriage. Technology and Health Care. 2015;23(s2). DOI: 10.3233/THC-150995.

Lajunen T, Summala H. Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour. 2003;6(2): 97-107. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1.

Pesti G, et al. Simulation of weaving traffic between freeway ramps. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, 23-27 Jan. 2011, Washington DC, United States. 2011.

Rong J, Mao K, Ma J. Effects of individual differences on driving behavior and traffic flow characteristics. Transportation Research Record. 2011;2248:1-9. DOI: 10.3141/2248-01.

Mirbaha B, Kordani AA, Salehikalam A, Zarei M. Analyzing stop time phase leading to congestion based on drivers' behavior patterns. Tarrahan Parseh Transportation Research Institute. 2018;(4). doi: 10.22119/IJTE.2018.49734.

Wang J, Chai R, Xue X. The effects of stop-and-go wave on the immediate follower and change in driver characteristics. Procedia Engineering. 2016;137: 289-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.261.

Saifuzzaman M, Zheng Z, Haque MM, Washington S. Understanding the mechanism of traffic hysteresis and traffic oscillations through the change in task difficulty level. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2017;105: 523-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.023.

Deng H, Zhang HM. On traffic relaxation, anticipation, and hysteresis. Transportation Research Record. 2015;2491(1): 90-97. DOI: 10.3141/2491-10.

Laval JA. Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: An improved measurement method. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2010;45(2): 385-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.07.006.

Chen D, Ahn S. Capacity-drop at extended bottlenecks: Merge, diverge, and weave. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2018;108(2): 1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.006.