Quantifying the Impact of Individual Characteristics on Driving Speed – Elasticity Insights from Taxi Drivers’ Education and Personality Traits
Downloads
This study investigates the impact of individual characteristics on taxi drivers’ speed choices based on a survey of 102 valid responses. The drivers’ speed behaviour was categorised into four intervals, considering age, driving experience, personality traits and vision correction. A model based on disaggregated theory was developed to measure the impact of these factors on driving speed. Using elasticity theory, the sensitivity of these factors was analysed. The results indicated that the absolute values of the elasticity coefficients for age, vision correction and passenger presence were all below 1.000, implying that these factors have a relatively inelastic influence on the selection of speed intervals. In contrast, in the four speed intervals, the elasticity values of education are -6.194, -4.108, -5.011 and -2.972, and those of personality are 7.228, 7.602, 10.753 and 9.298; all of them have an absolute value greater than 1.000. These findings suggest that education level and personality traits significantly impact taxi drivers’ capacity to drive safely. For the benefit of passenger safety, the qualification and daily management of taxi drivers must consider their individual characteristics.
Downloads
Huang J, Li Z, Li L. Unraveling the impact of autonomous driving threat perception on risky driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2025;114:308–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.004.
Omidi L, Mousavi S, Moradi G, Taheri F. Traffic climate, driver behaviour and dangerous driving among taxi drivers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2022;28(3):1482–1489. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1903705.
Taiwo OA, Hassan SA, Mohsin RB, Mahmud N. Road traffic accidents involvement among commercial taxi drivers in Nigeria: Structural equation modelling approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2024;208:107788. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107788.
Kaltsidis A, Ketikidis K, Basbas S, Aifadopoulou G, Grau JMS. A decision support system for taxi drivers. Transportation Research Procedia. 2023;69:123–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.153.
Cheng AS, Ting KH, Liu KP. Impulsivity and risky decision making among taxi drivers in Hong Kong: An event-related potential study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2016;95:387-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.021.
Wu JW, Yan XD, Essam R. Discrepancy analysis of driving performance of taxi drivers and non-professional drivers for red-light running violation and crash avoidance at intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2016;91:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.028.
Quang NL, Andy HL, Lynn B. Prevalence and factors associated with road traffic crash among taxi drivers in Hanoi, Vietnam. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013;50:451–455. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.022.
Peng Z, Wang Y, Truong LT. Individual and combined effects of working conditions, physical and mental conditions, and risky driving behaviors on taxi crashes in China. Safety Science. 2022;151:105759. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105759.
Yeh MS, Tseng CM, Liu HH. The factors of female taxi drivers’ speeding offenses in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2015;32:35-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.005.
Yuan SH, Sun QK. Taxi accidents and psychological analysis of drivers. Hunan Agricultural Machinery. 2014;41:131-132. DOI:CNKI:SUN:HNNJ.0.2014-01-071.
Ahmed I, et al. Characterizing lane changing behavior and identifying extreme lane changing traits. Transportation Letters. 2023;15(5):450–464. DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2022.2066856.
Si Y, Guan HZ. Customer-search destination selection behavior of taxi driver based on the theory of planned behavior. China Safety Science Journal. 2016;16:147-152. DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2016.06.023.
Zhang ML, Mao HQ. A prevalence survey of traffic safety knowledge，attitude and behavior among taxi drivers in Xining. Qinghai Medical Journal. 2011;41:2-6. DOI:CNKI:SUN:QHYZ.0.2011-07-002.
Husak D. Vehicles and Crashes: Why is the moral issue overlooked? Social Theory and Practice. 2004;30:351–370. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23562447.
Bellet T, Cunneen M, Mullins M. From semi to fully autonomous vehicles: New emerging risks and ethico-legal challenges for human-machine interactions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2019;63:153-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.004.
Faas SM, Mathis LA, Baumann M. External HMI for self-driving vehicles: which information shall be displayed?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2020;68:171-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009.
Hansson SO, Belin MÅ, Lundgren B. Self-driving vehicles—an ethical overview. Philosophy & Technology. 2021;34(4):1383–1408. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-021-00464-5.
Caballero WN, Naveiro R, Rios ID. Modeling ethical and operational preferences in automated driving systems. Decision Analysis. 2022;19(1):21–43. DOI: 10.1287/deca.2021.0441.
Cociu S, Deleu R, Rimis C. Ethical aspects in road traffic safety and driving behavior change. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics. 2022;5:57-69. DOI: 10.35478/jime.2022.1.08.
Evans L. Death in traffic: Why are the ethical issues ignored? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. 2008;2(1). DOI: 10.2202/1941-6008.1014.
Ori M. Why not road ethics?. Theoria. 2020;86:389-412. DOI: 10.1111/theo.12248.
Charlton SG, Starkey NJ. Driving on urban roads: How we come to expect the ‘correct’ speed. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2017;108:251-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.010.
Chen T, Sze NN, Saxena S. Evaluation of penalty and enforcement strategies to combat speeding offences among professional drivers: A Hong Kong stated preference experiment. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2020;135:105366. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105366.
Malyshkina NV, Mannering FL. Markov switching multinomial logit model: An application to accident-injury severities. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2009;41:829-838. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.006.
Cai B, Quddus M, Wang X, Miao Y. New modeling approach for predicting disaggregated time-series traffic crashes. Transportation Research Record. 2024;2678(3):637–648. DOI: 10.1177/03611981231182703.
Storani F, Di PR, De LS. A hybrid traffic flow model for traffic management with human-driven and connected vehicles. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics. 2022;10(1):1151–1183. DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2026836.
Zeng Chao, Ma CX, Wang K. Predicting vacant parking space availability: A DWT-Bi-LSTM model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2022;599:127498. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127498.
Ma CX, Dai GW, Zhou JB. Short-term traffic flow prediction for urban road sections based on time series analysis and LSTM_BILSTM method. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2022;23:5615-5624. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3055258.
Ma CX, Wang C, Xu XC. A multi-objective robust optimization model for customized bus routes. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2021;22:2359-2370. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3012144.
Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis. Cambridge University Press. 2015.
Wang Y, Geng K, May AD, Zhou H. The impact of traffic demand management policy mix on commuter travel choices. Transport Policy. 2022;117:74–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.002.
Yuan HZ, Feng ZX, Jian XP. Selection model of car parking facility in urban central region. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development. 2012;29:137-141. DOI:CNKI:SUN:GLJK.0.2012-10-027.
Ding C, Cao X, Yu B, Ju Y. Non-linear associations between zonal built environment attributes and transit commuting mode choice accounting for spatial heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2021;148:22–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.021.
Ma CX, Zhou JB, Yang D. Research on the relationship between the individual characteristics of electric bike riders and illegal speeding behavior: A questionnaire-based study. Sustainability. 2020;12:799. DOI: 10.3390/su12030799.
Wang C, et al. Investigating the influence of connected information on driver behaviour: An analysis of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts in the middle section of urban road. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2024;107:464–483. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.012.
Jiang K, et al. The use of car safety seats for children in China: A questionnaire survey based on the theory of planned behavior. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2023;24(5):414–422. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2193279.
Wang C, et al. Predicting the duration of reduced driver performance during the automated driving takeover process. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2025;29(2):218–233. DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2024.2307029.
Kadoya Y, Watanapongvanich S, Khan MSR. How is emotion associated with driving speed? A study on taxi drivers in Japan. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2021;79:205–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.020.
Sun L, Cheng L, Zhang Q. The differences in hazard response time and driving styles of violation-involved and violation-free taxi drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2021;82:178–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.011.
Poó FM, Ledesma RD, López SS. The taxi industry: Working conditions and health of drivers, a literature review. Transport Reviews. 2018;38(3):394–411. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1370035.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hao Qiao, Chao Zeng, Xuecai(Daniel) Xu, Changxi Ma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
